Almost to the finish line

I’m about finished with the biographical profile I’ve been working on this semester. It’s not due until Wednesday, but I’m turning it in tomorrow since I won’t have any more time to work on it after tomorrow morning. I’ve asked DS to read it once more, to look for mistakes or places that could use more elaboration. Once he’s read it, I’ll likely read it six more times before I print it out because I’m slightly obsessive/compulsive. I’ve been working to tweak the language of the piece; I find the language I default to in first drafts is rather cumbersome—using two words when one would be more effective, finding a lot of “thats” (lately I’ve found myself disliking the word “that” and what it does to my prose—it’s useful when it’s necessary, of course, but it’s not necessary as often as one would think).

Speaking of language, the first book on my To Read list–once this paper has been turned in–is Anthony Burgess’ book, A Mouthful of Air: Language, Languages…Especially English. It was a steal at a local used bookstore, and I’ve been waiting until I finished my school work to get started on it. It looks like the time is here!

And next Monday: Radiohead!

Interconnections

With one essay, Guy Davenport demonstrates to me the difference between looking at American Gothic and seeing American Gothic.

“We can see a bamboo sunscreen–out of China by way of Sears Roebuck–that rolls up like a sail: nautical technology applied to the prairie. We can see that distinctly American feature, the screen door. The sash-windows are European in origin, their glass panes from Venetian technology as perfected by the English, a luxury that was a marvel of the eighteenth century, and now as common as the farmer’s spectacles, another revolution in technology that would have seemed a miracle to previous ages. Spectacles began in the thirteenth century, the invention of either Salvino degl’Armati or Alessandro della Spina; the first portrait of a person wearing specs is of Cardinal Ugone di Provenza, in a fresco of 1352 by Tommaso Barisino di Modena. We might note, as we are trying to see the geographical focus that this painting gathers together, that the center for lens grinding from which eyeglasses diffused to the rest of civilization was the same part of Holland from which the style of the painting itself derives.

Another thirteenth-century invention prominent in our painting is the buttonhole. Buttons themselves are prehistoric, but they were shoulder-fasteners that engaged with loops. Modern clothing begins with the buttonhole. The farmer’s wife secures her Dutch Calvinist collar with a cameo brooch, an heirloom passed down the generations, an eighteenth-century or Victorian copy of a design that goes back to the sixth century B.C.

She is a product of the ages, this modest Iowa farm wife: she has the hair-do of a medieval madonna, a Reformation collar, a Greek cameo, a nineteenth-century pinafore.

Martin Luther put her a step behind her husband; John Knox squared her shoulders; the stock-market crash of 1929 put that look in her eye.” [my favorite line]

The train that brought her clothes–paper pattern, bolt cloth, needle, thread, scissors–also brought her husband’s bib overalls, which were, originally, in the 1870s, trainmen’s workclothes designed in Europe, manufactured here for J.C. Penney, and disseminated across the United States as the railroads connected city with city. The cloth is denim, from Nîmes in France, introduced by Levi Strauss of blue-jean fame. The design can be traced to no less a person than Herbert Spencer, who thought he was creating a utilitarian one-piece suit for everybody to wear. His own example was of tweed, with buttons from crotch to neck, and his female relatives somehow survived the mortification of his sporting it one Sunday in St. James Park.”

From the essay, The Geography of the Imagination

I can honestly say I’d never given much thought to buttonholes before reading this piece.

So it goes

He [Vonnegut] describes the warm reception he received from Russian soldiers as America’s last “good war” drew to a close. “We accepted their congratulations with good grace and proper modesty,” he notes, “but I felt then as I feel now, that I would have given my life to save Dresden for the World’s generations to come. That is how everyone should feel about every city on Earth.”

A review of Armageddon in Retrospect, a posthumous collection of Vonnegut’s work.

How does this keep happening?

My work area has taken over more than half a six-foot long table (again). These are books I’m compelled to keep within reach, though I tend to read only those I need for class. I’ve been trying to make a dent in that Hitchen’s book for awhile. booksontable.jpg